Back

No effect of anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation during motor sequence learning in older people

Kerstens, S.; Broeder, S.; Gilat, M.; Nackaerts, E.; Vandendoorent, B.; Nieuwboer, a.; Orban de Xivry, J.-J.

2026-02-19 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.18.706569 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) has previously been shown to enhance motor learning in older adults. However, findings across studies are inconsistent, which may be partly due to variability in stimulation parameters and montages across experimental protocols. ObjectiveWe aimed to replicate the effect of 1mA conventional anodal tDCS over the M1 hotspot during one session of motor sequence learning on retention (24h) compared to sham stimulation in older adults. In addition, we aimed to compare the effect of high definition (HD tDCS) versus conventional tDCS on motor sequence learning to explore if stimulation montage and according focality affects the effect sizes found. MethodsIn a pre-registered, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design including 52 older adults, we investigated the effects of conventional and HD tDCS on motor sequence learning in a serial reaction time task (SRTT), using a crossover design for the stimulation montage. ResultsAlthough all groups showed motor sequence learning over time, both during practice sessions (main effect of time: p < 0.0001), as well as across session (main effect of time: p < 0.0001), we observed no significant effects on learning between stimulation groups (main effect of stimulation: p = 0. 68) or montages (main effect of montage: p = 0. 66). For all groups, motor sequence learning improvements were maintained but not further enhanced after 24 hours of consolidation (HD tDCS: p = 0.64; conventional tDCS: p = 0.76; HD sham: p = 0.69; conventional sham: p = 0.57). ConclusionOur findings indicate that neither conventional nor HD tDCS enhanced motor sequence learning in older adults. To better understand potential long-term or cumulative effects, we recommend that future studies investigate the effects of repeated tDCS sessions administered throughout the motor learning process.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.6%
2
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.7%
3
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
8
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
10
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
14
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
18
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
24
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%