Back

Combining xenium in situ spatial transcriptomics and imaging mass cytometry on a single tissue section

Allen, R.; Duchini, E.; Ameen, F.; Ashhurst, T. M.; Ireland, R.; Conway, J.; Bai, X.; Hong, A.; Ferguson, A. L.; Patrick, E.; Palendira, U.

2026-02-19 immunology
10.64898/2026.02.18.700929 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial imaging technologies provide an expansive view of tissue microenvironments through high-plex profiling of protein and molecular targets in situ. Imaging mass cytometry (IMC; Standard BioTools) is a trusted method for defining immune phenotypes based on up to 40 protein targets, whilst Xenium in situ spatial transcriptomics (Xenium; 10x Genomics) is an emerging platform that can measure up to 5000 mRNA markers simultaneously. Although these platforms can reveal valuable insights on their own, there is an increasing need to analyse samples using a multi-omics approach to further our understanding of complex biological processes. To address this, we have assessed a novel dual-platform workflow that combines Xenium and IMC on a single formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue section to enable the spatial profiling of both mRNA and protein targets at single-cell resolution. The feasibility of the workflow was determined by comparing the staining quality of IMC performed after Xenium to that of IMC performed alone on an adjacent tissue section, confirming that Xenium has little to no negative impact on subsequent IMC protein staining. Although the location of transcripts picked up by Xenium correlated with the corresponding proteins picked up by IMC at a global scale, discrepancies between the two technologies were apparent at the single-cell level. This is to be expected, as biologically transcript expression does not always correlate with protein, and both platforms have their own technical limitations. However, when we analyse T cells identified by both technologies, as opposed to T cells identified by Xenium or IMC alone, it produces the most biologically meaningful results at both the transcript and protein level for specific T cell markers. These results highlight how integration of the two platforms, identifying the presence of both RNA and protein, can foster a more comprehensive view of cellular landscapes and provide a greater depth of functional capabilities and cellular interactions.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
2
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
11
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
21
ImmunoInformatics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
27
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%