Back

Potential public health and economic impact of the next-generation COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1283 in the Netherlands

van der Pol, S.; Beck, E.; Westra, T.; Postma, M.; Boersma, C.

2026-02-19 health economics
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346561 medRxiv
Show abstract

COVID-19 remains a substantial public health challenge in the Netherlands. Next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, mRNA-1283, is approved in the European Union, with potential for higher relative vaccine efficacy compared with originally-licensed COVID-19 vaccines. Its potential public health and economic impact, in adults [≥]60 years and high-risk 18-59 years, was modelled versus no vaccination and originally-licensed mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2, adapting a published static Markov model with 1-year time horizon. COVID-19 burden reflected two full post-pandemic seasons. Vaccine efficacy versus mRNA-1273 was based on pivotal phase 3 NextCOVE trial data; efficacy versus BNT162b2 was derived from an indirect treatment comparison. The economically justifiable price (EJP) of mRNA-1283 versus no vaccination, and price premiums over existing vaccines, were determined at a willingness-to-pay threshold of {euro}50,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Without COVID-19 vaccination, an estimated 460,000 infections, 23,800 hospitalizations and 5,300 deaths would occur. With current coverage, mRNA-1283 was estimated to prevent 68,000 infections, 5,400 hospitalizations, and 1,200 deaths, saving 9,667 QALYs and over {euro}66.5 million in treatment costs. The EJP was {euro}238 versus no vaccination. Compared with mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2, mRNA-1283 was estimated to prevent additional burden (e.g., 1,309 and 1,679 hospitalizations, respectively), and was cost-effective at an incremental EJP of {euro}62 versus mRNA-1273, and {euro}80 versus BNT162b2. The results support continued COVID-19 vaccination to mitigate the ongoing health and societal burden of SARS-CoV-2 in the Netherlands. The comparative analyses indicate that mRNA-1283 may be associated with substantial health benefits over originally-licensed mRNA vaccines; consequently, its use may further improve health outcomes and economic efficiency within COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.6%
3
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
28
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%