Back

Eligibility Without Equity: Rethinking Age-Based Adult Vaccine Policies

Amin, M. S.; Collins, B.; Beavis, C.; Sigafoos, J.; French, N.; Hungerford, D.

2026-02-18 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.17.26346473 medRxiv
Show abstract

Embedding equity into vaccine eligibility is essential for reducing health inequalities. Yet, adult vaccine eligibility in most European countries is primarily based on fixed age thresholds, prioritising cost-effectiveness. This approach risks excluding the most vulnerable populations living in deprived communities with poorer health and shorter survival into older age. Extending eligibility based on clinical risk partially addresses this gap. Higher rates of underdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis in deprived populations limit the fairness of this approach, however, with the status quo of adult vaccine eligibility criteria likely doing active harm. In this perspective, we demonstrate the extent of this inequity in England. For example, the average male living in Hyde Park in the northern city of Leeds dies 9.5 years too early to ever receive the RSV vaccine offer at age 75. Meanwhile, a male living in Hyde Park, London, lives much longer and may receive the benefits of the RSV vaccine for 10 years or more. Drawing on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, we propose further evaluation of alternative eligibility models that incorporate local place-based disadvantage, which will inherently account for life expectancy and deprivation levels. These models will ensure earlier access to vaccines for communities with the greatest need and improve health equity without overwhelming health systems.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
9
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.0%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
20
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
28
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%