Back

Determinants of Collaborative Physician-PA Teams in Ambulatory Care: A Qualitative Study

Nordan, A. G.; Ward, I.; Stancil, M. L.; Schmale, G.; Bodner, G.

2026-02-17 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.02.16.26346411 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe physician assistant (PA) workforce has expanded rapidly in the United States, increasing the importance of effective physician-PA collaboration. Although PAs improve patient outcomes and access to care, the determinants of effective collaboration has not been well studied. North Carolina provides a relevant context due to its growing PA workforce and supervisory regulatory structure, in which physicians retain administrative responsibility for PA supervision across practice settings. This study examines determinants of effective physician-PA collaboration in ambulatory care settings in North Carolina. MethodsFour virtual focus groups were conducted with practicing physicians (n=7) and PAs (n=9) across multiple specialties in NC. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify facilitators and barriers to collaboration. ResultsThematic analysis identified six major themes reflecting relational, organizational, and systemic influences on teamwork. Findings demonstrate collaboration evolves over time through early-career mentorship, continuity of working relationships, and progressive trust development. Differences in professional identity, power dynamics, and misunderstanding of PA scope of practice influenced autonomy and delegation. Systemic factors such as reimbursement structures and organizational supervisory policies hindered efficient teamwork. LimitationsFindings are based on a small, purposive sample within a single state and may not be generalizable to all ambulatory settings or regulatory environments. Perspectives may also reflect self-selection bias among participants with strong views on collaboration. ConclusionsEffective physician-PA collaboration depends on intentional onboarding, role clarity, interprofessional education, and alignment of organizational policies with regulatory standards to support team-based care.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.5%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.9%
3
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
29
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%