Development and psychometric evaluation of The Index of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Symptoms (TIMES) Part I: Rasch Analysis and Content Validity
Horton, M. C.; Tyson, S. F.; Fleming, R.; Gladwell, P.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo develop and psychometrically evaluate an assessment of symptoms in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) MethodsAn initial symptom list was devised from the relevant literature with the patient and clinician advisory groups. An online survey with 85 symptom items in eight domains was completed by people with ME/CFS. Each item had two response structures (assessing symptom frequency and severity on five-point scales). Rasch analysis assessed each domain for unidimensionality, targeting, internal reliability, item fit and local dependency. ResultsSurvey data (n=721) indicated various item anomalies and inter-item dependencies, leading to item re-formatting or removal. The frequency and severity-based responses broadly replicated each other, and a four-point response format appeared more appropriate than a five-point response format. Following Rasch-based scale amendments, a revised version with a single four-point response format was re-administered to test the modifications. Validation data (n=354) showed the modified scale had an improved response structure and functionality across all domains, satisfying Rasch model assumptions. Additionally, domain-level super-items allowed for a summated total score along with sub-scales summarising neurological and autonomic symptoms, again satisfying Rasch model assumptions. ConclusionsThe Index of ME Symptoms (TIMES) and its associated sub-scales and domain scales are stable, valid assessments of symptoms in ME/CFS.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 91%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 90%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of UK healthcare workers 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reclaiming health: a qualitative, explorative study of long covid recovery journeys involving mind-body approaches. 91%
- A Pattern-Based Heart Rate Variability Approach in Somatic Symptom Disorder: Evidence from the SOMA.SSD Study 91%
- Discernment of Mediator and Outcome Measurement in the PACE trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 92%
- Prevalence and determinants of persistent symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2: Protocol for an observational cohort study (LongCOVID-study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 90%
- Perspectives of Researchers and Clinicians on Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: An Interview Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.