Back

Does Vitamin D Supplementation Modulate Metabolic Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Abumueis, S. I.; Alqadi, S.; Al Tarteer, A.; Alrefai, W.; Alzoughool, F.; Jew, S.; Qudah, T.

2026-02-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346232 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVitamin D supplementation has been investigated for potential associations with cardiometabolic risk factors related to cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of vitamin D supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors--including lipid profile, blood pressure, and glycaemic parameters--and to explore whether age and baseline serum vitamin D concentrations modify these associations. Research Design and MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing oral vitamin D supplementation with placebo in adults. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool, and pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Results14,051 abstracts were retrieved, of which 45 were used for data analysis. Vitamin D supplementation reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 0.136 mmol/L (95%CI: -0.215, -0.56), systolic blood pressure by 2.79 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.648, -0.938), fasting blood glucose by -0.11 (95%CI:-0.185, -0.036), and hemoglobin A1c by 0.164% (95%CI: -0.322, -0.006) compared with placebo. Subgroup analyses revealed reductions in SBP and LDL cholesterol among participants aged [&ge;]55 years and reductions in fasting blood glucose in participants with age < 55 years. While favourable effects on fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c were observed with a baseline blood level of vitamin D of concentrations (<50 nmol/L). ConclusionsVitamin D supplementation may be associated with modest modifications in selected cardiometabolic risk factors; including systolic blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c. Age and baseline vitamin D status appear to modulate these effects. The clinical relevance of these modest effects remains uncertain. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols are required to clarify potential effect modification by age and baseline vitamin D status. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42020165293) FundingThis research received funding from the Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa 13133, Jordan

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%