Back

Trends in Breast Pump Prescription Claims: A Nationwide Population-Based Study of Outpatient Statutory Health Insurance Billing Data in Germany, 2011 to 2024

Fischer, L.; Daudi, A. E.; Haile, Z. T.; Theurich, M. A.

2026-02-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.13.26345532 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this analysis was to explore temporal and regional trends in breast pump prescription claims in outpatient settings in Germany, and to characterize the types of pumps covered. Study designWe conducted a nationwide secondary analysis of outpatient statutory health insurance billing data for breast pump prescriptions from 2011 to 2024, covering nearly 90% of the German population. Billing data from community pharmacies were scaled to full national coverage using regional extrapolation factors and subsequently linked with national and state-level live birth statistics to adjust for birth rates and population size across federal states. A list of breast pumps covered by German national statutory health insurance funds was queried for information on their characteristics. ResultsPrescription of electric pumps dominate outpatient statutory health insurance breast pump claims in Germany, with national statutory health insurance funds covering {euro}15.3 million for pump rentals. Manual pumps dispensed through community pharmacies accounted for {euro}27 thousand in 2024. Between 2011 and 2024, electric pump claims increased by a factor of 2.57, rising from 235.4 to 605.2 claims per 1000 infants newly enrolled in statutory health insurance (average annual growth rate 8.24%). Claims varied substantially across federal states but increased overall. ConclusionsThis is the first epidemiological analysis of statutory health insurance prescription claims for breast pumps in Germany. We found that electric breast pumps are important medical devices supporting outpatient human milk expression in Germany. Prescription claims appear to be very common and have shown an increase over the past 13 years.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
3
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
13
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
24
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%