Cohort Profile: The Adolescent and Young Adult Tracking Engagement and Management Skills (AYA TEAMS) Longitudinal Cohort of Childhood Cancer Survivors in the United States
King-Dowling, S.; Woodard, K.; Faust, H.; Drake, S.; Gov, L.; Szalda, D.; Prussien, K. V.; Ginsberg, J. P.; Hobbie, W.; Tucker, C. A.; Barakat, L. P.; Deatrick, J.; Li, Y.; Burns, K. C.; Nielsen, K.; Flores, V.; Ramaswamy, N.; Jankowski, M.; O'Hagan, B.; Wilkins, A.; Freyer, D. R.; Pai, A. L.; Schwartz, L. A.
Show abstract
PurposeTo describe the rationale, methods, and baseline sample descriptives of the Adolescent and Young Adult Tracking Engagement and Management Skills (AYA TEAMS) cohort. The AYA TEAMS study is a longitudinal observational cohort study that aims to identify determinants and patterns of self-management and engagement in cancer-related long-term follow-up (LTFU) care and validate a novel transition readiness assessment among adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer. ParticipantsAYA survivors of childhood cancer (ages 16-25) and their caregivers were enrolled from 3 large pediatric oncology centers across the United States from 2020-2022 and followed for 2 years (minimum) to 3 years and 3 months (if transferred to adult care). AYA inclusion criteria were: past childhood cancer diagnosis, at least 2 years off-treatment, 5 years since diagnosis, engaged with the participating pediatric health care system within the last 18 months, cognitively able to complete study procedures, and English speaking. AYA completed a comprehensive battery of measures including assessments of self-management and transition readiness at baseline and annually for 2 years. For AYA transferred to adult care, separate measures were administered at the time of transfer (following last pediatric visit) and 15 months post transfer. Caregivers (English or Spanish-speaking) completed a single survey at baseline to capture family functioning, psychosocial risk, and transition readiness. Cancer diagnosis, treatment modalities, treatment-related late effects, and engagement in LTFU care were captured via electronic medical record review. In total, 709 AYA were enrolled and 587 were included in the final cohort [Mage=19.7 years, 52.5% female, 38.2% from racial and/or ethnic minoritized groups, (REMG)]. The cohort was on average 7.3 years old at the time of diagnosis and 10.5 years off treatment. Half (52.5%) were survivors of leukemia/lymphoma, 38.0% solid tumors, and 9.5% central nervous system tumors. Three hundred and ninety-nine caregivers participated (90% mothers). Findings to DateEnrolled AYA excluded from the baseline cohort were more likely to be male, from REMG, and/or to enroll without a caregiver. Baseline cohort differences between sites emerged for age, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and treatment modalities and intensity. Future PlansData collection was completed in April 2025. Findings from this cohort will elucidate important predictors of self-management and engagement in recommended annual LTFU and inform the design of interventions to reduce disengagement in LTFU. Strengths and LimitationsO_LIThis study is the first known prospective cohort of AYA-only long-term survivors of childhood cancer in the United States recruited from pediatric cancer centers. C_LIO_LIThis study achieved high enrollment and retention rates across a medically and demographically diverse sample. C_LIO_LIInformed by multiple theoretical self-management models, this study will be able to examine predictors and transactional relationships of AYA survivor self-management, including engagement in pediatric and adult cancer-related long-term follow-up care. C_LIO_LIReliance on English-speaking AYA and those currently engaged with the health care system are limitations. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Southern European Prospective Investigation Into Childhood Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC kids ): Study Design and Protocol 94%
- Childhood Cancer Survival in the Highly Vulnerable Population of South Texas: A Cohort Study 93%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 92%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 92%
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 95%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 89%
- A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the global data involving 61,532 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The ENGAGE Study: A Randomized Trial Optimizing Uptake of Germline Cancer Genetic Services in Childhood Cancer Survivors 94%
- Vaccination reduces need for emergency care in breakthrough COVID-19 infections: A multicenter cohort study 89%
- Quantifying COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy during early vaccination rollout in Canada 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 91%
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 91%
- Clinical, Behavioral and Social Factors Associated with Racial Disparities in Hospitalized and Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients from an Integrated Health Care System in Georgia 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.