Back

Evaluating the Impact of VA's Contract Buyout Program: An Analysis of Rural Workforce Recruitment Challenges

Khan, A.; Kenyon, S.; O'Mahen, P.; Spencer, V. R.; SoRelle, R.; Hysong, S. J.

2026-02-14 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.02.11.26346089 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 33% of U.S. Veterans live in rural areas, often facing significant barriers to accessing healthcare due to staffing shortages at VA facilities. The Contract Buyout (CBO) program, authorized under the PACT Act of 2022, was designed to address rural healthcare staffing shortages by enabling Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities to buy out existing service contracts to work in rural VA facilities. Despite its potential, uptake of the program has been limited, with just 18 hires and $1.5M in expenditures, despite a congressional spending authorization of up to $40M. This evaluation explores the barriers and facilitators in implementation of the CBO program across rural VA facilities. MethodsUsing the RE-AIM framework, we conducted a mix-method qualitative evaluation. Semi-structured interviews were completed by 15 interviewees across 8 rural VA facilities, including hiring leaders and physicians. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis, supported by a descriptive survey to capture the CBO program awareness and experience. We conducted 15 interviews across 8 rural VA medical centers with facility-level hiring leaders and clinicians who were familiar with or involved in using the CBO program. ResultsHR-related delays and procedural ambiguities disrupted contract execution and undermined the CBO programs effectiveness globally. However, sites with strong internal champions and proactive HR teams reported greater success. Interviewees reported the CBO program as a promising tool, though its lack of dedicated funding and resource dissemination hindered broader adoption. ConclusionThe CBO program holds potential as a flexible rural recruitment incentive but faces structural barriers that limit its reach and adoption. Future evaluations should Evaluate whether individual rural VA sites have budgetary flexibility, funding mechanisms, and related resources required to effectively utilize the CBO program.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
9
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%