Population immunity to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 is dominated by anti-neuraminidase antibodies
Singh, G.; Bhavsar, D.; Hermann, E.; Gleason, C.; Singh Sandhu, H.; Singh, P.; Nardulli, J.; Lyttle, N.; Chen, Y.; Sabaiduc, S.; Pena Alzua, G.; Skowronski, D. M.; Simon, V. M.; Krammer, F.
Show abstract
Clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) viruses continue to expand geographically and across mammalian hosts, raising concern about pandemic potential. The degree and specificity of pre-existing immunity in humans are key determinants of this risk. We analyzed hemagglutinin (HA)-and neuraminidase (NA)-specific antibody responses in 300 sera collected from adults in New York City. While HA directed binding antibodies to clade 2.3.4.4b H5 were low and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies were absent, we detected widespread binding and functional NA antibodies against N1 neuraminidases from clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 viruses. Neuraminidase inhibition (NI) titers were highest against North American D1.1 genotype N1 viruses and correlated strongly with neutralizing activity, whereas HA-binding antibodies did not. An additional N-linked glycosylation site, as found in the NA of a human D1.1 isolate from British Columbia, reduced susceptibility to NI antibodies. Antibodies to N5 from H5N5 were minimal. These findings indicate that population-level immunity to clade 2.3.4.4b H5 viruses is dominated by NA-directed antibodies, with important implications for pandemic risk assessment. ImportanceUnderstanding how pre-existing human immunity shapes susceptibility to emerging influenza viruses is central to pandemic preparedness. Here, we determined that human sera contain widespread, functional antibodies targeting H5N1 neuraminidase, which correlate with virus neutralization, whereas HA directed responses are limited. We further show that acquisition of an NA glycosylation site reduces antibody inhibition, highlighting a potential pathway for immune evasion. These results identify neuraminidase-specific immunity as a major immunological barrier to severe H5N1 disease in humans and emphasize the need to incorporate NA antigenicity into influenza surveillance, risk assessment, and next-generation vaccine design.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential antigenic imprinting effects between influenza H1N1 hemagglutinin and neuraminidase in a mouse model 98%
- Influenza Viruses in Mice: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Serial Passage and Effects of Sialic Acid Structural Variation 97%
- Nucleoside-modified mRNA-based influenza vaccines circumvent problems associated with H3N2 vaccine strain egg-adaptation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imprinted anti-hemagglutinin and anti-neuraminidase antibody responses after childhood infections of A(H1N1) and A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza viruses 98%
- Are we serologically prepared against an avian influenza pandemic and could seasonal flu vaccines help us? 97%
- Low levels of H5N1 HA and NA antibodies in the human population are boosted by seasonal A/H1N1 infection but not by A/H3N2 infection or influenza vaccination 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Potently neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies against the zoonotic pararubulavirus Sosuga virus 95%
- Vaccine Breakthrough Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta or Omicron (BA.1) Variant Leads to Distinct Profiles of Neutralizing Antibody Responses 93%
- Disruption of innate defense responses by endoglycosidase HPSE promotes cell survival 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neuraminidase antigenic drift of influenza A virus H3N2 clade 3c.2a viruses alters virus replication, enzymatic activity and inhibitory antibody binding 96%
- Balancing the influenza neuraminidase and hemagglutinin responses by exchanging the vaccine virus backbone 96%
- High-Throughput, Single-Copy Sequencing Reveals SARS-CoV-2 Spike Variants Coincident with Mounting Humoral Immunity during Acute COVID-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.