Back

What effects the engagement of splints and orthotics by people after stroke? A qualitative interview study.

Lloyd, S. J.; Stockley, R. C.

2026-02-14 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.02.10.26345062 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite recommendations in clinical guidelines, clinical experience indicates that engagement with splints and orthotics varies amongst people after stroke. ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to understand the factors that influence engagement with splints and orthotics in people after stroke. MethodsPeople after stroke who had been wearing a splint or orthotic (also known as devices) for at least 2 months under the care of one Community Neurosciences Team in the UKs National Health Service were included. Semi structured interviews based on the constructs of Banduras Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) were used to gather participants views, and a framework analysis applying the constructs of SCT was completed using NVIVO software. ResultsFour key themes were identified: 1. Self-Regulation; difficulties applying the device and aesthetic acceptability. 2. Self-Efficacy; increased confidence when wearing the device and reduced motivation to wear the device. 3. Outcomes Expectation; reduced falls risk, improved gait, improved balance, maintaining range of movement, and negative effects such as discomfort, pain, itching. 4. Social Support; support needed to apply the device and the burden on family members/carers to apply the device correctly. ConclusionsThe findings of this study highlight key factors that influence engagement with orthotics and splints. These include difficulty applying the device after stroke, device aesthetics, comfort, and the importance of continued support from carers. Manufacturers should consider how people after stroke can independently don and doff devices. Education of carers and family members also appears key to support their engagement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.9%
2
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
5
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
17
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
28
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%