What effects the engagement of splints and orthotics by people after stroke? A qualitative interview study.
Lloyd, S. J.; Stockley, R. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite recommendations in clinical guidelines, clinical experience indicates that engagement with splints and orthotics varies amongst people after stroke. ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to understand the factors that influence engagement with splints and orthotics in people after stroke. MethodsPeople after stroke who had been wearing a splint or orthotic (also known as devices) for at least 2 months under the care of one Community Neurosciences Team in the UKs National Health Service were included. Semi structured interviews based on the constructs of Banduras Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) were used to gather participants views, and a framework analysis applying the constructs of SCT was completed using NVIVO software. ResultsFour key themes were identified: 1. Self-Regulation; difficulties applying the device and aesthetic acceptability. 2. Self-Efficacy; increased confidence when wearing the device and reduced motivation to wear the device. 3. Outcomes Expectation; reduced falls risk, improved gait, improved balance, maintaining range of movement, and negative effects such as discomfort, pain, itching. 4. Social Support; support needed to apply the device and the burden on family members/carers to apply the device correctly. ConclusionsThe findings of this study highlight key factors that influence engagement with orthotics and splints. These include difficulty applying the device after stroke, device aesthetics, comfort, and the importance of continued support from carers. Manufacturers should consider how people after stroke can independently don and doff devices. Education of carers and family members also appears key to support their engagement.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis 98%
- Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence 96%
- Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 97%
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 95%
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal caregiving following stroke: a qualitative exploration of carer self-identification, care-related language and support experiences 95%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 94%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of Adults with Upper-limb Difference and their Views on Sensory Feedback for Prostheses: A Mixed Methods Study 97%
- “It all ends too soon” - Exploring stroke survivors and physiotherapists perspectives on stroke rehabilitation and the role of technology for promoting access to rehabilitation in the community 96%
- Overground robotic walker use in the home and community: a six-month prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a Bedside Scale for Assessing Upper Limb Function Following Stroke: A Methodological Study 94%
- Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada 90%
- Public perceptions and interactions with UK COVID-19 Test, Trace and Isolate policies, and implications for pandemic infectious disease modelling 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.