Smoking Status and Cardiovascular Mortality Differ by Arterial Stiffness Level Assessed by Pulse Pressure Index
Cheon, P.; Mostafa, M. A.; Grdzelishvili, A.; Cornea, D.; Liu, J.; Kazibwe, R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine whether the association between smoking status and cardiovascular (CV) mortality differs by arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse pressure index (PPI), among U.S. adults without baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD). MethodsUsing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2016, we analyzed 16,605 adults aged 40-79 years without baseline CVD, with mortality follow-up through December 31, 2019. PPI was calculated as (systolic blood pressure [SBP] - diastolic blood pressure [DBP])/SBP and split at the cohort median (0.415) as low versus high. Smoking status was classified as never, former, or current, yielding six joint PPI-smoking groups. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CV mortality, adjusting for demographics and cardiometabolic risk factors. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 8.4 years, 518 CV deaths (3.1%) occurred. Among individuals with low PPI, former smokers had CV mortality comparable to never smokers (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56-1.33), whereas current smokers remained at elevated risk (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.65-3.81). This pattern was not observed in the high PPI stratum, where both former and current smokers had significantly higher CV mortality than never smokers. ConclusionFormer smokers with low PPI had CV mortality similar to never smokers, whereas former smokers with high PPI remained at elevated risk. These findings suggest that the CV benefit of smoking cessation may be greatest when arterial stiffness is minimal, supporting early cessation before substantial vascular aging occurs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 95%
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 94%
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences between brachial and aortic blood pressure in adolescence and their impact on classification of hypertension 94%
- Low blood pressure phenotype underpins the tendency to reflex syncope 93%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic Differences Between Women and Men with Elevated Blood Pressure in China 95%
- Alpha globin gene copy number and hypertension risk among Black Americans 93%
- Genetic loci associated with prevalent and incident myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation of an Outcome-Driven Threshold for Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity: An Individual-Participant Meta-Analysis 95%
- Elevated blood pressure in the emergency department - a risk factor for incident cardiovascular disease: An EHR-based cohort study 93%
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 93%
- Association between adiposity and cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and meta-analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.