Consensus recommendations for supporting people waiting for total hip and knee arthroplasty in Scotland: A modified Delphi study
Cooper, K.; Stage, E.; Hart-Winks, E.; Swinton, P.; Alexander, L.; Shim, J.; Herbert, T.; Bridgman, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundMany people experience long waiting times for hip and knee replacement surgery, negatively impacting physical conditioning and quality of life, and therefore need evidence-informed strategies to support them while they are waiting. ObjectiveTo develop consensus-based recommendations for supporting people waiting for hip or knee replacement in Scotland. DesignThree-round online modified Delphi study involving 17 people with experience of waiting for hip or knee replacement and 30 professionals involved in supporting them. MethodsTwo rounds of online survey and one online workshop. Participants rated agreement with 113 (round 1), 40 (round 2) and 20 (round 3) statements on a 5-point Likert scale, with consensus based on [≥]70% agreement. Items were modified and added in subsequent rounds based on content analysis of participant comments. The final recommendations represent items that reached consensus in both participant groups after 3 rounds. Results47 participants took part in round 1 (17 patients, 30 professionals), 41 in round 2 (13 patients, 28 professionals) and 23 in round 3 (8 patients, 15 professionals). Eighty-two of 113 statements reached consensus in round one, 20 of 40 in round two and 6 of 20 in round 3. The final recommendations comprise 108 statements relating to: preoperative education; patient optimisation; other interventions to support people waiting; and, strategies to support people waiting a long time for surgery. ConclusionsThese findings are an important step towards developing best practice guidance for supporting people waiting for hip and knee replacement in Scotland.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 93%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 93%
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 94%
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 94%
- Development of the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains following lower limb amputation and prosthetic rehabilitation, through systematic review and best fit framework synthesis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 94%
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 94%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and content validation of a questionnaire identifying patients’ functional priorities and abilities after hip or knee arthroplasty 96%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 92%
- Very low levels of physical activity among a broad group of patients hospitalized following hip fracture: A prospective cohort study (the HIP-ME-UP cohort study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 94%
- The smallest worthwhile effect on pain and function for rotator cuff repair surgery: a benefit-harm trade-off study 90%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.