Back

Rigorous Validation of Paw Preference Using Three Complementary Behavioral Assays in Sprague Dawley Rats

Pokharel, D.; Le, K.; Beligala, D. H.; Subramanian, T.; Venkiteswaran, K.

2026-02-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.08.704691 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Paw preference, or handedness, is a widely studied behavioral trait used to assess lateralization and motor function in rodents. This study aimed to determine the consistency and reliability of three commonly used behavioral tests to rigorously assess paw preference: the Collins Test, the Staircase Test, and the Pawedness Trait Test. Thirty Sprague Dawley rats (12-48 weeks; 20 females, 10 males) were subjected to all three behavioral tests. Paw uses were recorded, and the laterality index was calculated for each test. Additional cohorts of younger rats (6-9 weeks; 45 females, 45 males) and older rats (12-48 weeks; 38 females, 45 males) were tested to assess the effects of age and sex on paw preference. ANOVA, Fleiss and pairwise Cohens Kappa were used for statistical analysis. All three tests yielded comparable measures of paw preference (ANOVA, p = 0.801). Substantial inter-test agreement was demonstrated by Fleiss kappa ({kappa} = 0.761, p = 3.93 x 10{square}12). Paw preference did not significantly vary by age or sex, and the distribution of left, right, and ambidextrous preference categories aligned with existing literature. The Collins, Staircase, and Pawedness Trait Tests provide consistent, reliable assessments of paw preference in Sprague Dawley rats. These validated behavioral assays can serve as essential tools for preclinical research, including but not limited to models of motor asymmetry observed in stroke, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, and language lateralization, as well as neurodegenerative diseases. HighlightsO_LIRigorously validated paw preference in Sprague Dawley rats using three commonly used behavioral tests. C_LIO_LIDemonstrated strong inter-test agreement across Collins, Staircase, and PaTRaT ({kappa} = 0.761) C_LIO_LIShowed that paw preference remains stable across age and sex in large cohorts C_LIO_LIApplied standardized LI thresholds to enable cross-test comparability C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
9
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
11
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
13
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
16
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%