Back

Prognostic Significance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose, Protein, and White Blood Cell Count in Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease.

Gouli, S.; Niraula, S.; Baran, A.; Zhang, H.; O'Regan, R.; Mohile, N.; Anders, C.; Hardy, S.; Dhakal, A.

2026-02-09 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.07.26345775 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLeptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a serious complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with poor survival. This single-institution retrospective study compares overall survival (OS) among MBC patients with LMD based on CSF parameters (glucose, protein, and WBC count) MethodologyMBC patients who were diagnosed with LMD between 2010-2023 at Wilmot Cancer Institute were screened for eligibility. Only those with available data on CSF glucose, protein, and WBC count were included. OS was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for multivariate analysis. ResultsOut of 69 patients with MBC LMD, 28 had CSF data and were included in the final analysis. The CSF cytology-positive cohort had significantly lower glucose levels vs the CSF cytology-negative cohort [median (IQR) 40 (18-58) vs 64 (53-92) mg/dl, p=0.006]. Median CSF WBC count was significantly higher in the CSF cytology positive cohort vs the CSF cytology negative cohort [median (IQR) 13 (6-44) vs. 2(2-4)cells/mm3, p=0.001]. When stratified by CSF cytology results and CSF glucose levels, the CSF cytology negative, glucose-low group was associated with the worst OS, while the CSF cytology negative, normal/high glucose group was associated with the best OS(p=0.03) in an unadjusted analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that low CSF glucose was independently associated with poorer survival [HR 4.64 (1.71, 13.2)]. Neither CSF protein levels nor CSF WBC counts were significantly associated with OS in unadjusted and multivariate analyses. ConclusionLow CSF glucose was associated with worse OS than normal/high CSF glucose. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that CSF protein or CSF WBC counts were associated with OS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.