Prognostic Significance of Cerebrospinal Fluid Glucose, Protein, and White Blood Cell Count in Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease.
Gouli, S.; Niraula, S.; Baran, A.; Zhang, H.; O'Regan, R.; Mohile, N.; Anders, C.; Hardy, S.; Dhakal, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundLeptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a serious complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with poor survival. This single-institution retrospective study compares overall survival (OS) among MBC patients with LMD based on CSF parameters (glucose, protein, and WBC count) MethodologyMBC patients who were diagnosed with LMD between 2010-2023 at Wilmot Cancer Institute were screened for eligibility. Only those with available data on CSF glucose, protein, and WBC count were included. OS was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox models were used for multivariate analysis. ResultsOut of 69 patients with MBC LMD, 28 had CSF data and were included in the final analysis. The CSF cytology-positive cohort had significantly lower glucose levels vs the CSF cytology-negative cohort [median (IQR) 40 (18-58) vs 64 (53-92) mg/dl, p=0.006]. Median CSF WBC count was significantly higher in the CSF cytology positive cohort vs the CSF cytology negative cohort [median (IQR) 13 (6-44) vs. 2(2-4)cells/mm3, p=0.001]. When stratified by CSF cytology results and CSF glucose levels, the CSF cytology negative, glucose-low group was associated with the worst OS, while the CSF cytology negative, normal/high glucose group was associated with the best OS(p=0.03) in an unadjusted analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that low CSF glucose was independently associated with poorer survival [HR 4.64 (1.71, 13.2)]. Neither CSF protein levels nor CSF WBC counts were significantly associated with OS in unadjusted and multivariate analyses. ConclusionLow CSF glucose was associated with worse OS than normal/high CSF glucose. There was insufficient evidence to suggest that CSF protein or CSF WBC counts were associated with OS.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 94%
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 94%
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Absence of Glutathione S-Transferase Theta 1 Gene is Significantly Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in Pakistani Population and Poor Overall Survival in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case-Control and Case Series Analysis 90%
- Circulating tumor fraction analyses with ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing predict response to chemoradiation and recurrence in stage IV small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a longitudinal case study 90%
- Activity of Estrogen Receptor β Agonists in Therapy-Resistant Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting PI3K and TP53 Pathway Disruptions in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Among Hispanic/Latino Patients 89%
- Peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit increased mitochondrial respiration after adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy for early breast cancer 89%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 93%
- The Impact of Variance in Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-1 Expression on Breast Cancer Prognosis is Stratified by Clinical and Anthropometric Factors 92%
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.