Back

Proteomics and single-cell transcriptomics identify LRP1 as a diagnostic biomarker for atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma.

Lingo, J. J.; Balas, M. M.; Bashyam, A. M.; Hosler, G. A.; Squires, G. T.; Klein, J. C.

2026-02-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.04.703892 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) are cutaneous neoplasms that fall along a spectrum. PDS is more aggressive than AFX with higher rates of local and distant metastases. Diagnostic biomarkers for AFX and PDS are lacking and therefore these tumors are diagnosed only after excluding other dermal spindle cell neoplasms, including cutaneous leiomyosarcoma (cLMS), spindle cell melanoma (SCM), and sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma (sSCC). To identify clinically valuable biomarkers, we contrast the tumors within the diagnostic differential using single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk proteomic data. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of transcripts and proteins enriched in AFX/PDS identified multiple shared pathways associated with cell adherence and the extracellular matrix. We identify that LRP1, LTBP2, and NAV1 are all enriched in AFX/PDS over other tumors in the differential at both the level of mRNA and protein. IHC reveals that LRP1 is 90% sensitive and 73% specific for AFX/PDS in a cohort of AFX, PDS, cLMS, SCM, and sSCC. This outperforms published data for CD10, which is currently used clinically (sensitivity 83.5% and specificity 50%). When used in conjunction with LTBP2, specificity for AFX/PDS within the differential rises from 73% to 93%. These findings suggest that LRP1, particularly if evaluated in conjunction with existing stains, can improve diagnostic accuracy for AFX and PDS.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
3
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
5
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
19
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%