Back

Landing-Related Mechanisms Predominate in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Among Young Athletes Regardless of Contact

Sakoda, S.

2026-02-05 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.02.04.26345606 medRxiv
Show abstract

ContextACL injury prevention in young athletes has traditionally relied on a dichotomous classification of contact versus noncontact mechanisms; however, this framework may not adequately capture the movement processes underlying many injuries. ObjectiveTo classify ACL injury mechanisms in athletes aged [&le;]22 years with a specific focus on landing-related movements and to examine their associations with sport contact characteristics and age. DesignRetrospective observational study. SettingSingle sports injury clinic. Patients or Other ParticipantsA total of 151 athletes aged [&le;]22 years (mean age, 17.7 {+/-} 2.1 years) diagnosed with ACL injury between January 2017 and November 2025. Main Outcome Measure(s)ACL injury mechanisms were classified as landing-related without contact (L), landing-related with contact (Lc), or direct contact injury (C). Landing-related injuries (L + Lc) were compared with direct contact injuries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with landing-related injury. ResultsLanding-related injuries accounted for 123 cases (81.5%), including 88 noncontact and 35 contact-related landing injuries, whereas direct contact injuries occurred in 24 cases (15.9%). Athletes with direct contact injuries were significantly older than those with landing-related injuries (19.2 {+/-} 1.7 vs 17.5 {+/-} 2.5 years, p = 0.03). In multivariable analysis, participation in noncollision sports was strongly associated with landing-related injury (odds ratio [OR] = 9.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.03-31.5; p < 0.001), whereas increasing age was inversely associated with landing-related injury (OR per year = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.56-0.90). Sex was not independently associated with injury mechanism. ConclusionsMost ACL injuries in athletes aged [&le;]22 years occurred through landing-related mechanisms, regardless of contact. These findings highlight insufficient control of landing and foot contact as a fundamental mechanism of ACL injury in young athletes and support prevention strategies focused on movement quality during sport-specific tasks. Key Points{blacksquare} Most ACL injuries in athletes aged [&le;]22 years occurred during landing or foot contact, regardless of whether external contact was present. {blacksquare}Noncollision sports and younger age were strongly associated with landing-related ACL injury mechanisms. {blacksquare}ACL injury prevention in young athletes should prioritize improving landing and foot contact control rather than focusing solely on contact characteristics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.5%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.8%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
14
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%