Back

Frailty, initial attrition and the potential use of novel platinum-free options for non-small-cell lung cancer in the real-world setting

Christopoulos, P.; Blasi, M.; Langer, S.; Shi, S.; Cvetkovic, J.; Bozorgmehr, F.; Allgaeuer, M.; Yuskaeva, K.; Schneider, M.; Shah, R.; Kuon, J.; Stenzinger, A.; Glueck, T.; Thomas, M.

2026-02-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345340 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOlder age and comorbidities complicate initial therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as platinum ineligibility has not been systematically characterized. MethodsAll 2592 patients presenting with metastatic NSCLC between 2018-2023 at Thoraxklinik Heidelberg were analyzed. ECOG status (PS), comorbidities, molecular testing, therapy, toxicities, and outcomes were verified from individual patient records. ResultsAmong 1306 patients with PD-L1 0-49%, systemic therapy was initiated in 74%. With availability of monoimmunotherapy, the treatment rate for patients with PD-L1[&ge;]50% (n=507) was higher by 5% (p=0.01), while best supportive care (BSC) by own choice was reduced (1.8% vs. 4.5%, p=0.005) more than medical BSC (mBSC 14.6% vs. 17.8%, p=0.11), and early death remained unchanged (ca. 4%). Initial suitability for systemic therapy was documented for 70% of cases eventually receiving mBSC after deterioration associated with comorbidities, metastatic burden, longer workup duration, or radiotherapy upfront (all p<0.001). The atezolizumab Summary of Medicinal Product Characteristics (SmPC) criteria, i.e. >80 years, or PS [&ge;]3, or comorbidities with PS [&ge;]2 or with age [&ge;]70, were fulfilled by 38% of patients (n=501) and associated with a >3-fold higher risk of BSC or early death (230/501), as well as significantly higher toxicity under platinum and shorter survival, which for a platinum dose ratio [&le;]60% across 4 cycles (9% of 1306) was similar to that with single-agent chemotherapy (median 5.1 months, p<0.001). SmPC criteria correlated better than comorbidity scores with foregoing platinum, but predictive performance for individual patients remained modest (AUC 0.71, p<0.001). ConclusionsThe high initial attrition of approximately 25% in NSCLC could improve with availability of monoimmunotherapy, but requires optimized, faster patient workflows for better mitigation. Adoption of the SmPC criteria could support a priori identification of patients at risk for mBSC or platinum overtreatment to enhance utilization of monoimmunotherapy and other novel platinum-free first-line options in the future. HighlightsO_LIA high initial attrition of approximately 25% is caused by deterioration after histologic diagnosis in advanced NSCLC. C_LIO_LIMonoimmunotherapy and optimized workflows may facilitate treatment for ca. 15% additional stage IV NSCLC patients. C_LIO_LISmPC criteria indicate cases at higher risk for BSC (>3x) or platinum overtreatment (i.e. platinum dose ratio [&le;]60%). C_LIO_LISmPC patients receiving platinum have higher toxicity and shorter survival than non-SmPC patients. C_LIO_LIImproved therapeutic allocation will be essential for utilization of any novel platinum-free option in the future. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
2
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
3
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
18
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
27
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%