Back

Effect Of A Bioresonance Device On Viability And Metabolic Activity In Human Umbilical Venous Endothelial Cells

Cosentino, M.; Rasini, E.; Ferrari, M.; Luini, A.; Legnaro, M.; Marino, F.

2026-02-02 cell biology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study was aimed at evaluating the effects of the bioresonance (BR)-based device QDOME MINI PERSONAL, produced by the society QMED SWISS SA (Lugano, CH), on the viability and mitochondrial metabolic activity of cultured human umbilical venous endothelial cells (HUVEC). To this end, HUVEC were cultured under standard conditions and exposed for 24 h to an "active" or to a mock BR device, in resting conditions and during treatment with H2O2 at the concentration of 500 M, added at the beginning of the 24 h period. The personnel who performed the experiments, collected, and analysed the data was unaware of which device was "active" and which was mock. At the end of the culture, HUVEC were harvested and evaluated for viability and mitochondrial metabolic activity by means of the Trypan Blue exclusion and the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide reduction method, respectively. Under control conditions, viability and mitochondrial metabolic activity were not different in HUVEC exposed to the "active" or to the mock device. HUVEC viability, however, was significantly reduced by exposure to H2O2 in samples exposed to the mock device but not in those exposed to the "active" device. HUVEC mitochondrial metabolic activity was significantly reduced by exposure to H2O2 in both samples exposed to the "active" and to the mock device, however reduction was significantly less in samples exposed to the "active" device. In conclusion, exposure to the BR-based device QDOME MINI PERSONAL, produced by the society QMED SWISS SA (Lugano, CH), prevented the H2O2-induced reduction of viability and reduced the H2O2-induced impairment of mitochondrial metabolic activity in cultured HUVEC.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
36.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
6
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
7
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
9
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
12
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
29
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%