Individualized Mapping of Functional Brain Networks in Older Adulthood
Hughes, C.; Krendl, A. C.; French, R. C.; Risacher, S. L.; Yu-Chien, W.; Saykin, A.; Betzel, R.
Show abstract
The functional network architecture of the aging brain undergoes significant systematic and idiosyncratic changes. Emergent individualized network mapping approaches may yield better or more sensitive explanatory insight about age-related neural and behavioral variability, although most applications have focused on young adults. In the current study, we tested the validity and impact of mapping individual-specific topography in two fMRI datasets comprising 112 young (18-35 years) and 176 older adults (60-92 years). Older adults had more idiosyncratic network topography than young adults. Individualized maps from resting-state fMRI improved network homogeneity and fidelity to task fMRI activations, while also exhibiting intra-individual reliability and inter-individual discriminability over a 2-year interval. Last, traditional group-averaged (vs. individualized) network mapping had a moderate-to-large impact on individual-level estimates of network segregation, a widely-studied measure of functional brain aging. Therefore, individualized network mapping captures important heterogeneity in older adulthood and may yield more precise characterization of neurocognitive aging.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Edge Community Entropy is a Novel Neural Correlate of Aging and Moderator of Fluid Cognition 98%
- Defining overlooked structures reveals new associations between cortex and cognition in aging and Alzheimer's disease 96%
- Entorhinal-hippocampal circuit integrity is related to mnemonic discrimination and amyloid-β pathology in older adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.