Back

Model-Based Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Effectiveness: Three Rounds of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing Versus One Colonoscopy

Dore, M.; Ebner, D. W.; Vahdat, V.; Estes, C.; Ozbay, A. B.; Foster, V.; Limburg, P. J.

2026-03-03 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.01.30.26344467 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSeveral colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities are guideline-recommended in the United States, yet they vary considerably in screening interval and real-world adherence. As a result, single-round test performance may not reflect cumulative effectiveness over time. This study compared the 10-year longitudinal outcomes of two CRC screening strategies-- triennial next-generation multitarget stool DNA testing (ng mt-sDNA) and decennial screening colonoscopy. MethodsThis study used the validated, microsimulation-based Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model to estimate 10-year cumulative outcomes for two guideline-recommended screening strategies: triennial ng mt-sDNA and decennial colonoscopy. Model inputs included test-specific performance and real-world adherence. Outcomes included CRC and precancerous lesions detected, CRC mortality reductions, and life-years gained (LYG). Sensitivity analyses examined the effects of varying both screening adherence and follow-up colonoscopy adherence. ResultsOver 10 years per 1,000 individuals offered screening, the ng mt-sDNA screening test detected 13% more precancerous lesions and 11% more CRC cases than colonoscopy, with a greater proportion of CRCs identified through screening rather than symptomatic detection. ng mt-sDNA resulted in greater CRC mortality reduction (33% vs 20%) and 62% more life-years gained, with consistent findings across sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsWith real-world adherence, screening with triennial ng mt-sDNA demonstrates superior cumulative effectiveness compared with decennial colonoscopy, driven by higher adherence and favorable longitudinal performance. These findings support the expanded use of noninvasive stool-based screening to reduce CRC mortality and alleviate capacity constraints associated with colonoscopy-based screening. Broader adoption of ng mt-sDNA may enhance population-level CRC prevention by increasing participation and improving early detection across the screening eligible population. Plain language summaryColorectal cancer screening tests are recommended at different time intervals and completed at different adherence rates in clinical practice. The analysis used a validated simulation model to compare 10-year outcomes of triennial next-generation multi-target stool DNA test (ng mt-sDNA) with a single colonoscopy, accounting for real-world screening and follow-up colonoscopy adherence. Our findings indicate that repeated ng mt-sDNA provides greater cumulative screening effectiveness than colonoscopy over a 10-year period.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
4
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.0%
8
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%