Back

Nutritional availability and carbon footprints of vegetarian and vegan diets: a cross-sectional analysis of dietary data for UK children

Coffey, A.; Lillywhite, R.; Oyebode, O.

2026-01-30 nutrition
10.64898/2026.01.28.26345075 medRxiv
Show abstract

As plant-based (PB) diets become more common among UK children, understanding their nutritional adequacy and environmental impact is vital. This study assessed nutrient intake and dietary greenhouse gas emissions among children following omnivorous, vegetarian, and vegan diets. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using three-day weighed food diaries from 39 UK children aged 2-12 years (omnivore n=15; and PB: vegetarian n=11; vegan n=13). Nutrients were analysed with and without supplementation using Nutritics software. GHGEs were calculated at the ingredient level (kgCO2e/day) and grouped by Eatwell Guide food categories. No dietary group met all nutrient reference values. Omnivores exceeded recommended intakes for saturated fat and free sugars while failing to meet the recommended intake for fibre, whereas PB children had intakes of these nutrients in the healthy range. PB diets were adequate in protein and vitamin B12 even in the absence of supplementation. Vegan children also met iron requirements from diet alone, whereas omnivore and vegetarian children did not meet iron targets without supplementation. Vitamin D intake was insufficient across all groups when supplements were excluded, with only vegan children achieving recommended levels through supplementation. Zinc requirements were met only by vegetarian children with the aid of supplements and were not met by vegan or omnivore children with or without supplementation. Iodine intake remained inadequate in vegan children even with supplementation. Mean daily GHGEs differed significantly between diet groups (p < 0.001): omnivores having the highest emissions, while vegans had the lowest emissions: 46% lower than omnivores, and 20% lower than vegetarians. Well-planned PB diets can meet most nutrient needs in UK children when supported by fortified foods and supplements, while substantially reducing dietary GHGEs compared with omnivorous diets. Shifting away from animal protein and dairy provides the greatest opportunity for improving both nutritional quality and environmental sustainability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
4
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
6
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
9
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
17
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%