Back

Preclinical and Clinical Study of Efficacy of NAOQ19 against SARS-COV2: A Comprehensive Evaluation

Subramanian, S.; Garhyan, J.; Mony, V.; Pattabiraman, S.; Kanchibhotla, D.

2026-02-02 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.01.27.26344593 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMore than 6.2 million people have died already from COVID-19. Drug resistance and relapse cases from first generation therapeutics calls for development of new drugs in alternative medicine. Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) that include herbal remedies and phytochemicals are usually not fully integrated into mainstream healthcare systems. The study proposes a CAM remedy, a new polyherbal formulation NAOQ19 against the SARS-CoV-2. MethodsThe present study consists of invitro and invivo evaluation of NAOQ19 against SARS-CoV-2 infection. First, invitro testing of NAOQ19 anti-viral activity was carried out on three relevant cell lines: Vero E6, A549ACE2 and Huh 7.5.1 ACE2TMPRSS2. Next, animal model testing of NAOQ19 was performed in Syrian golden hamsters along with positive control Remdesivir and infection control for 3 days to determine the efficacy and safety of the formulation. Finally, a double blind randomized clinical trial with mild to moderate COVID-19 infected patients were evaluated to test the efficacy of NAOQ19 in human settings. ResultsThis study demonstrated a strong anti-viral (low EC50) activity in cell culture with live virus and exhibits reduced plaque forming units (high antiviral activity) in the Syrian golden hamster model. Moreover, in the clinical trials, NAOQ19 shows high efficacy demonstrating early recovery and reduced levels of inflammatory biomarkers among COVID-19 infected patients. ConclusionThis novel polyherbal formulation NAOQ19, demonstrates strong anti-viral activity in preclinical and clinical study; thereby proving its candidacy as a low-cost alternative medicine with minimal adverse effects.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.