Back

Development of the SCI-BodyMap: Measuring Mental Body Representations in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury

Carpentier, S.; Bottale, S.; Cenci, N.; Cracchiolo, M.; De Patre, D.; Gorosito, J.; Grimaldi, I.; Melo, M.; Neher, J.; Polinelli, B.; Rapacz, L.; Rigoni, M.; Romeo, F.; Sinner, J.; Zernitz, M.; Van de Winckel, A.

2026-01-28 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.01.23.26343891 medRxiv
Show abstract

There is evidence that adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) have deficits in mental body representations (e.g., altered visuospatial body maps and reduced body awareness), due to the diminished or lack of sensory information reaching the brain. These mental body representation deficits are important and need to be quantified, because they can impact daily functioning and they are associated with neuropathic pain. The currently available evaluation scales measure certain aspects of mental body representations with few having been assessed in adults with spinal cord injury. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no scales have been developed specifically for adults with spinal cord injury. Therefore, to address this gap, we completed two aims. First, we developed a novel evaluation scale (the SCI-BodyMap) to measure SCI-specific deficits in mental body representations. Second, we assessed the psychometric properties of inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2, and the Numeric pain rating scale. We also assessed feasibility, utility, and face validity with the QQ-10. We found good to excellent inter-rater and test-retest reliability, with the exception of two items showing moderate test-retest reliability. We did not find any correlations between the SCI-BodyMap with the Revised Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire or the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 and found fair correlations between high levels of neuropathic pain on the Numeric pain rating scale with highest level of neuropathic pain on the SCI-BodyMap. The scale proved to have high feasibility, utility, and face validity. Once more psychometric analyses are performed in a bigger sample, the SCI-BodyMap could be recommended for use in research and in the clinic.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
7
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
14
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
28
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%