Interpreting Breakthrough Infections Given Assortative Mixing of Partially Vaccinated Populations
Harris, M. J.; Arani, A.; Goel, T.; Zhang, K.; Beckett, S. J.; Lo, N. C.; Dushoff, J.; Weitz, J. S.
Show abstract
Declining vaccine coverage across the United States has increased the risk of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Even when vaccines have low primary failure rates, conventional epidemic theory predicts a strongly nonlinear, positive relationship between vaccine coverage and the fraction of breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals. These breakthrough infections may generate misconceptions that vaccines are not working and accelerate declines in confidence and coverage. Here, we set out to test predictions of conventional epidemic theory that assumes random mixing between individuals irrespective of vaccine status. In contrast to expectations from random mixing models, we find a far lower fraction of breakthrough infections in measles outbreak data from seven states in the United States. To explore this discrepancy, we evaluate an alternative, compartmental disease model that accounts for preferential mixing ( assortativity) between people with the same vaccination status. The model predicts significantly lower fractions of breakthrough infections, consistent with observations from measlesoutbreak data. Next, we leverage the deviation between statewide and school-level vaccine MMR coverage across kindergartens in sixteen states, finding substantial assortativity in all cases. Our model accounting for preferential mixing predicts the total number of breakthrough infections is nonlinear, peaking at intermediate coverage below vaccine-derived herd immunity. Nationally, 94% of counties that report MMR coverage are above the model-predicted breakthrough-maximizing coverage, suggesting that they are at risk for increasing breakthrough infections if coverage declines. Vaccination outreach and monitoring campaigns should develop proactive strategies to contextualize breakthrough infections before low levels of primary failure contributes to population-scale increases in preventable disease. Significance StatementInfections among vaccinated people may exacerbate vaccine hesitancy. Despite reports of breakthrough infections within ongoing measles outbreaks, we show that the realized fraction of breakthrough infections is far lower than predicted by conventional epidemic theory that assumes random mixing. Combining epidemic models and school-level vaccine coverage data, we show that breakthrough infections may be partially limited via preferential mixing ( assortativity) based on vaccination status. Given current MMR coverage, most of the country is at risk for increasing breakthrough infections if vaccine coverage declines further. We conclude that enhanced vaccine monitoring and outreach campaigns are needed to confront a potential positive feedback loop between increasing breakthrough infections and declining vaccine coverage that could substantially increase the burden of vaccine-preventable disease.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating primary and booster vaccination prioritization strategies for COVID-19 by age and high-contact employment status using data from contact surveys 97%
- Modelling the Interplay between Responsive Individual Vaccination Decisions and the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Quantifying individual-level heterogeneity in infectiousness and susceptibility through household studies 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.