Back

Ethical Considerations of Mitigating Data Loss: VLADISLAV, a Manifesto for Reliable Home Cage Systems

Virag, D.; Virag, A.-M.; Homolak, J.; Kahnau, P.; Babic Perhoc, A.; Krsnik, A.; Mihalic, L.; Knezovic, A.; Osmanovi{acute} Barilar, J.; Cifrek, M.; Trkulja, V.; Salkovic-Petrisic, M.

2026-01-21 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.01.20.700603 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Home cage monitoring (HCM) captures longitudinal animal behavioural data without human intervention. However, the systems complexity is rarely addressed in their design, increasing the risk of data loss, which wastes workhours, resources, and animal lives. To assess the feasibility of implementing modern, robust architectures in complex operant HCM paradigms, the VersatiLe Autonomous DevIce for Scheduled Learning Assessment Via Wi-Fi (VLADISLAV) was developed and employed to test cognitive deficits in the intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced rat model of sporadic Alzheimers disease (sAD). Reliability was modelled against a system architecture common in commercial HCM systems by modelling the failure rate of the devices critical components across typical durations of animal experiments. VLADISLAV assessed multiple cognitive dimensions of a rat model of sAD with automated, scheduled testing. Its design enabled simultaneous, redundant recording to multiple devices in real time, as well as batch remote control and supervision of tens of VLADISLAVs. VLADISLAV is estimated to reduce component failure rate [~]200-fold at {euro}40/device. Data loss due to system failure shouldnt be accepted as a normal occurrence and robust system design is an ethical imperative. VLADISLAVs robustness and utility demonstrate the potential of embedded networked systems, used in other industries and consumer electronics for over a decade. Today, the open source ecosystem enables cost-effective implementation of such architectures in HCM by biomedical researchers with no electronic engineering education, preventing data loss and facilitating researchers and technicians day-to-day work. Considering these findings, it is apparent that the implementation of modern architectures in HCM is long overdue.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.7%
2
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
4
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
8
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
15
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
18
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
24
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
29
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%