Back

Which Pediatric Patients Still Experience Laboratory-Confirmed and Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Quality Analysis

Araujo da Silva, A. R.; Eimi Kitagima Tiba, J.; Frade Brandao Julio da Silva, L.

2026-01-24 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.01.20.26344479 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCentral line-associated bloodstream-infection (CLA-BSI) and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) remain a significant concern in pediatric inpatient units. ObjectiveTo analyze a case series of CLA-BSI and CR-BSI in hospitalized pediatric patients in hospitals with rigorous infection prevention measures. Materials and MethodsThis was an analytical, descriptive, and retrospective study conducted in patients aged 0 to 18 years, admitted between August 2023 and March 2025, with a diagnosis of CLA-BSI or CR-BSI in two pediatric hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Variables potentially associated with the occurrence of infection were analyzed. ResultsA total of 86 infections were evaluated, comprising 66 CLA-BSI and 20 CR-BSI. Sixty patients (69.8%) were male, with a mean age of 71.8 months. Sixty-five (83.7%) had previous comorbidities, 63 (73.2%) had a prior hospitalization, and 27 (31.4%) had another invasive device. The mean time from catheter insertion to infection diagnosis was 32.1 days, and the mean time from hospital admission to infection onset was 18.45 days. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 40/86 (46.5%) cases. At 30 days post-infection, 61/86 (70.9%) had been discharged, 20/86 (23.3%) remained hospitalized, and 5/86 (5.8%) had died. There was no correlation between the bacterial group and the type of catheter used (p=0.068), nor between infection type (CLA-BSI vs. CR-BSI) and mortality outcome (p=1). ConclusionsCLA-BSI and CR-BSI occurred predominantly in patients with prolonged hospital stays and underlying comorbidities, and were mainly caused by Gram-negative bacteria.

Published in Journal of Surgery and Research · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.