Back

Social Vulnerability Does Not Predict 3-Month Functional Outcomes After Mechanical Thrombectomy

Melkumyan, N. A.; Martinez, E.; Zampolin, R. L.; Khatri, D.; Balogun, O.; Esenwa, C.

2026-01-19 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.16.26344311 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy has become standard-of-care in the treatment of emergent large vessel occlusion. However, it is not yet known if social factors impact post-thrombectomy recovery. We studied the association between clinical and sociodemographic factors with 3-month functional outcomes post thrombectomy. MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, 291 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at Montefiore-Einstein Hospital in NYC between 1/1/2021 and 4/1/2024 were analyzed. The cohort spanned multiple census tracts across New York City and surrounding areas and included a diverse patient population. The primary outcome was change in modified Rankin Scale ({Delta}mRS) from pre-stroke baseline to 90-180 days post-stroke. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between {Delta}mRS and social vulnerability, adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, and procedural success. ResultsWorse functional outcomes were associated with older age (OR 1.03; p = 0.004), male sex (OR 1.85; p = 0.006), higher stroke severity (OR 1.71; p < 0.001), and lower reperfusion success (OR 2.22; p = 0.011). Social vulnerability was not significantly associated with long-term outcomes (OR 0.88; p = 0.550). ConclusionIn this cohort, functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy were influenced by clinical and procedural factors rather than sociodemographic vulnerability. While equitable outcomes were observed in the acute setting, ongoing research is needed to explore potential disparities across the broader stroke care continuum, including post-acute recovery.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.