Back

BRASH syndrome as a clinical syndrome driven by polypharmacy: a pharmacovigilance study of 1,081 cases from FAERS

Costantini, I.; Breglia, A.; Mantelli, G.; Zanatta, M.; Ricci, G.

2026-01-16 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.01.15.26344203 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBRASH syndrome, characterized by bradycardia, renal failure, atrioventricular nodal blockade, shock, and hyperkalemia, is a recently described clinical entity that remains underrecognized. Current evidence is limited to case reports and small case series, and the pharmacological patterns underlying this syndrome have not been systematically evaluated. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to March 2025. Individual case safety reports explicitly coded as BRASH syndrome were identified and deduplicated. Associations between BRASH syndrome and individual drugs were assessed using Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) and Information Components (ICs) with 95% confidence intervals. Drugs showing positive disproportionality signals were categorized according to their presumed role in the BRASH pathophysiological cascade. ResultsA total of 1,081 reports were included. The median age of patients was 74 years (interquartile range, 64-82); 45.5% were female, 38.7% were male, and sex was not reported in 15.8% of cases. All cases were classified as serious adverse drug reactions, including 7.1% fatal and 34.4% life-threatening events. Strong disproportionality signals were observed for atrioventricular nodal blocking agents, including metoprolol (ROR, 58.6; 95% CI, 52.0-66.1), verapamil (ROR, 52.5; 95% CI, 43.4-63.3), and carvedilol (ROR, 28.7; 95% CI, 24.4-33.6). Additional signals involved drugs plausibly contributing to renal dysfunction or hyperkalemia. Multiple pharmacologically relevant drugs were frequently reported within individual cases. ConclusionsBRASH syndrome is associated with combinations of cardiovascular and renal-active medications rather than single-drug exposure, supporting its interpretation as a polypharmacy-driven clinical syndrome in vulnerable patients.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.