Back

Women-related cardiovascular research funding under Canada's Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis policy from 2000 to 2024: an interrupted time series analysis

Chen, N.; Kendall, T.; Zhang, W.; Brotto, L. A.

2026-01-16 health policy
10.64898/2026.01.14.26344152
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women, yet women have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular research. In Canada, sex- and gender-based analysis (SGBA) policies were introduced to address these gaps, including mandatory applicant-level requirements in 2010 and reviewer-level guidance in 2018. How these policies have influenced funding allocation for women-related cardiovascular research remains unclear. ObjectiveTo examine long-term trends in CIHR investment in women-related cardiovascular research and assess changes associated with SGBA policy milestones. MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal study using Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding data from fiscal year 2000-2001 to 2024-2025. Women-related cardiovascular research projects were identified through terminology searches in funded project titles, keywords, and abstracts. Annual fiscal-year proportions of cardiovascular research funding allocated to women-related research were analysed using segmented regression, with interruption points in 2010 and 2018. ResultsAmong 17,168 cardiovascular research related grant annual records, 11.33% were classified as women-related projects. These projects accounted for 11.85% of total CIHR cardiovascular research funding over the 25-year period. Funding increased before 2010, declined between 2011 and 2017, and accelerated after 2018. Segmented regression showed a small immediate increase in 2010, followed by a negative post-2010 trend and a significant positive quadratic trend after 2018. ConclusionsApplication-level SGBA requirements had limited influence on investment patterns, whereas the 2018 reviewer-level guidance aligns with the subsequent acceleration in women-related cardiovascular research funding. Strengthening SGBA implementation, expanding targeted funding opportunities, and improving monitoring of sex-and-gender-disaggregated outputs may help address persistent gaps in women-related cardiovascular research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 4%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 20%
18.5%
3
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 0.7%
11.1%
4
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 4%
4.9%
6
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 0.6%
2.7%
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 8%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 60%
2.5%
9
CMAJ Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
1.9%
10
JAMA
based on 17 papers
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 18%
1.4%
13
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 19%
1.4%
14
BMC Health Services Research
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
18
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 11%
0.7%