Predicting Body Composition from Chest Radiographs by Deep Learning: 10-year Mortality and Geriatric Outcomes
Ji, S.; Kim, K.; Cho, K.; Jang, I.-Y.; Baek, J. Y.; Kim, N.; Kim, H.-K.; Jang, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundBody composition strongly influences clinical outcomes in older adults, yet body mass index (BMI) lacks discriminatory power, and standard tools such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry are not routinely accessible. Deep learning enables scalable, opportunistic assessment of body composition from chest radiographs (CXRs), one of the most widely available imaging modalities. Methods and FindingsUsing the Inception-V3 architecture, we developed a deep-learning model using 107,568 paired CXR and BIA records (2016-2018). The model was temporally validated on a separate dataset of 77,655 records (2014-2015). Our model predicted skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and fat mass (FM) with high accuracy (SMM: Pearson r = 0.967, MAE 1.40 kg; FM: r = 0.924, MAE 1.61 kg). In a cohort of 5,932 older adults (aged [≥]65years), a 1-SD increase in CXR-predicted skeletal muscle index (SMI) was associated with a significant reduction in 10-year all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.65 [95% CI 0.58-0.73] for men; 0.80 [0.67-0.97] for women). In an external validation of 925 geriatric clinic patients, predicted SMI also showed comparable associations with geriatric parameters, including lower odds of sarcopenia (per 1 SD increase: 0.29 [0.22-0.38] for men; 0.25 [0.18-0.34] for women) and frailty (0.62 [0.48-0.78] for men; 1.00 [0.81-1.23] for women). These associations were more robust than those of BMI. Key limitations include the retrospective, single-center design and the use of a relatively healthy screening population. ConclusionA deep learning model applied to routine CXRs enables accurate estimation of skeletal muscle and fat mass, demonstrating prognostic and functional relevance comparable to BIA measurements. This approach may serve as a practical, low-cost tool for risk stratification and long-term care planning, particularly in older adults.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle mitochondrial bioenergetic capacities is associated with multimorbidity burden in older adults: the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) 94%
- A Bayesian Network Analysis of Gait Speed Change Upon Transition to Uneven Surfaces in Older Adults 94%
- Deep Learning Chest X-Ray Age, Epigenetic Aging Clocks and Associations with Age-Related Subclinical Disease in the Project Baseline Health Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progression of Frailty and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries 93%
- Energetics and Clinical Factors for the Time Required to Walk 400 Meters The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA) 92%
- Accelerated Aging Mediates the Associations of Unhealthy Lifestyles with Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Mortality: Two Large Prospective Cohort Studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Prospective Cohort Study to Develop Multi-Biomarkers Panel to Define Biological Ageing in Five Different Cohorts from Newborn to Oldest Adult: A Study Protocol 92%
- Point-of-care electroencephalography for prediction of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study 89%
- Study Research Protocol for Phenome India-CSIR Health Cohort Knowledgebase (PI-CHeCK): A Prospective multi-modal follow-up study on a nationwide employee cohort. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an electronic frailty index for hospitalized geriatric patients in Sweden 95%
- Plasma Level of ATPase Inhibitory Factor 1 (IF1) and intrinsic capacity in community-dwelling older adults: Prospective data from the MAPT Study 94%
- Relationship between five Epigenetic Clocks, Telomere Length and Functional Capacity assessed in Older Adults: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analyses 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.