Back

Predicting Body Composition from Chest Radiographs by Deep Learning: 10-year Mortality and Geriatric Outcomes

Ji, S.; Kim, K.; Cho, K.; Jang, I.-Y.; Baek, J. Y.; Kim, N.; Kim, H.-K.; Jang, M.

2026-01-15 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.01.13.26343990 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBody composition strongly influences clinical outcomes in older adults, yet body mass index (BMI) lacks discriminatory power, and standard tools such as bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry are not routinely accessible. Deep learning enables scalable, opportunistic assessment of body composition from chest radiographs (CXRs), one of the most widely available imaging modalities. Methods and FindingsUsing the Inception-V3 architecture, we developed a deep-learning model using 107,568 paired CXR and BIA records (2016-2018). The model was temporally validated on a separate dataset of 77,655 records (2014-2015). Our model predicted skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and fat mass (FM) with high accuracy (SMM: Pearson r = 0.967, MAE 1.40 kg; FM: r = 0.924, MAE 1.61 kg). In a cohort of 5,932 older adults (aged [≥]65years), a 1-SD increase in CXR-predicted skeletal muscle index (SMI) was associated with a significant reduction in 10-year all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.65 [95% CI 0.58-0.73] for men; 0.80 [0.67-0.97] for women). In an external validation of 925 geriatric clinic patients, predicted SMI also showed comparable associations with geriatric parameters, including lower odds of sarcopenia (per 1 SD increase: 0.29 [0.22-0.38] for men; 0.25 [0.18-0.34] for women) and frailty (0.62 [0.48-0.78] for men; 1.00 [0.81-1.23] for women). These associations were more robust than those of BMI. Key limitations include the retrospective, single-center design and the use of a relatively healthy screening population. ConclusionA deep learning model applied to routine CXRs enables accurate estimation of skeletal muscle and fat mass, demonstrating prognostic and functional relevance comparable to BIA measurements. This approach may serve as a practical, low-cost tool for risk stratification and long-term care planning, particularly in older adults.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.1%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
5
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%