Back

Subchronic Toxicity Study of Nitric Oxide Nano Bubbles Injection in Sprague-Dawley Rats

Novrial, D.; Inayati, N. S.; Gumilas, N. S. A.; Kurniawan, D. W.; Sumitro, S. B.

2026-01-12 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.01.10.698772 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Following the success of hydrogen nanobubble technology, development has expanded to include similar products with other gases, such as nitric oxide (NO). In previous studies, NO donors have been frequently used for both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. However, the use of NO in nanoformulations has received little attention thus far. Thus, 90 days of subchronic toxicity testing in Sprague-Dawley rats were used in this study to assess potential adverse effects of intravenous administration of NO nanobubbles (NONB). Hematological factors, serum biochemistry, and histology of the liver, kidney, heart, lung, and spleen were investigated. The findings of the intravenous NONB injection trial in rats, using graded doses of 0.01 mL, 0.04 mL, and 0.06 mL, demonstrated no deaths during the 90-day treatment period. Biochemical parameters for liver function, lipid profile, kidney function, and serum electrolyte levels remain within acceptable limits, with slight variations in sodium and potassium levels. This condition was also supported by histological findings in the liver, kidney, and spleen, indicating mild to moderate damage, while the heart and lungs were normal. Thus, the intravenous administration of NONB at a dose of up to 0.06 mL in this subchronic toxicity test remains safe. Further studies with adjustments to the test formulation are highly encouraged until the clinical trial stage in humans.

Published in Applied Biosciences · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.