Differential Outcomes with Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Mortada, I.; Lee, A.; Sahu, A.; Vidal, E.; Paul, K. K.; Alhanbali, Y.; Mansour, S.; Chatila, K.; Jehle, D.; Blackwell, T.; Jneid, H.
Show abstract
AbstracO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in heart failure (HF), yet comparative effectiveness between individual agents in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) remains limited. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network electronic health record database. Adults ([≥]18 years) with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 41-49% initiating empagliflozin or dapagliflozin between September 2021 and December 2025 were included. Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values, yielding 1,466 patients per group. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year after treatment initiation and included all-cause mortality, hospitalization, HF exacerbation, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Risk analyses and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with hazard ratios (HRs) were performed. ResultsIn the matched cohort, empagliflozin was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96), substantially fewer hospitalizations (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.67), and HF exacerbations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57-0.73) compared to dapagliflozin. Rates of UTI were similar between groups (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-1.01). ConclusionsIn this large real-world HFmrEF population, empagliflozin was associated with lower mortality, hospitalization, and HF exacerbation compared with dapagliflozin, with no significant difference in UTI risk. These findings suggest potential heterogeneity in clinical effectiveness among SGLT2 inhibitors in HFmrEF and warrant confirmation in prospective comparative studies. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=146 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26343819v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1000"> View larger version (46K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a0ce4corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@481df6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a71830org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@25114a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 96%
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 96%
- Sex Differences in Pulmonary Hypertension and Associated Right Ventricular Dysfunction 94%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 95%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
- The Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Managing Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 94%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 93%
- Artificial Intelligence Methods to Detect Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AIM-HFpEF) within Electronic Health Records: An equitable disease prediction model 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.