Back

Patterns in Patient Portal Enrollment and Use Among Hospitalized Children

Luke, M. J.; Zhu, Y.; Wolk, C. B.; Menko, S. G.; Capriola, D.; Fuller, K.; Scribano, P. V.; Bonafide, C. P.; Vasan, A.

2026-01-11 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.01.09.26343716 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesPatient portals allow adolescents and caregivers of pediatric patients to better engage with health care, improving their medication adherence, health knowledge, self-efficacy, and receipt of preventive care. However, disparities in access to and comfort with using these portals persist. Hospitalization represents a promising opportunity to address these disparities among a high-risk population. Design/MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis to identify disparities in portal enrollment and use (logins, messaging, or telehealth use) among patients admitted to two pediatric hospitals within a single health system from 2022-2024. We calculated unadjusted rates of portal enrollment and use before, during, and after hospitalization, stratified by patient-level factors (age, race/ethnicity, insurance coverage, medical complexity), household-level factors (preferred language), and population-level factors (neighborhood opportunity). We then used multivariable logistic regression to identify associations between these factors and portal enrollment and use. ResultsAmong 40,371 hospitalized patients, 93% had enrolled in our patient portal. Patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black, were publicly insured, had a household language other than English, and lived in lower opportunity neighborhoods had significantly decreased odds of portal enrollment and use before, during, and after hospitalization. ConclusionsDespite high overall rates of portal enrollment among our patient population, we observed persistent disparities in portal enrollment and use. Efforts to promote equitable portal usage among hospitalized children may be most effective when focused on families who are publicly insured, prefer languages other than English, or live in lower opportunity neighborhoods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.