Complementary Value of Transthoracic Echocardiography and Transcranial Doppler for Screening in Cryptogenic Stroke
Oshima, K.; Mochizuki, Y.; Mizuma, K.; Nohara, T.; Miki, A.; Yamada, M.; Oda, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Gohbara, S.; Ichikawa-Ogura, S.; Hachiya, R.; Toyosaki, E.; Fukuoka, H.; Murakami, H.; Uchida, N.; Shinke, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe optimal noninvasive screening strategy for detecting patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) remains uncertain. Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) are widely used, whether combining both modalities improves diagnostic performance has not been fully established. MethodsAmong 432 consecutive CS patients, 399 underwent collaborative screening with both TTE and TCD bubble tests performed by a multidisciplinary Heart-Brain Team, followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard. Bubble tests were conducted at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver (VM). Diagnostic performance, concordance between modalities, and incremental value were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, Cohens kappa statistics, and sequential logistic regression models. ResultsTEE confirmed PFO in 156 patients (39.1%). Both TTE and TCD demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy during VM than at rest, with no significant difference in area under the curve between modalities under VM. Sequential logistic regression showed a significant incremental increase in predictive value when TCD during VM was added to TTE during VM ({chi}{superscript 2} increase from 271.4 to 297.2; p<0.0001). Although overall agreement between TTE and TCD during VM was substantial ({kappa}=0.63), 54 patients (14%) showed discordant results, among whom 15 (28%) had TEE-confirmed PFO. Applying an "OR" rule (positive if either test was positive) significantly improved sensitivity compared with either modality alone, at the expense of modestly reduced specificity. ConclusionsDual screening with TTE and TCD during VM within a Heart-Brain Team framework significantly enhances sensitivity for PFO detection and reduces missed diagnoses in patients with CS. An "OR" rule interpretation represents a practical and clinically effective screening strategy.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 94%
- Right Heart Remodeling After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Pulmonary Atresia or Critical Stenosis with Intact Ventricular Septum 94%
- Patient Screening for Self-Expanding Percutaneous Pulmonary Valves using Virtual Reality 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of Patent Foramen Ovale Shunt Severity by Transesophageal Echocardiogram and Transcranial Doppler in Routine Clinical Practice 98%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 95%
- Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices Stroke Subtype Classification: A Novel Stroke Classification System in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 95%
- Variations in the Circle of Willis in a large population sample using 3D TOF angiography: The Tromso Study 94%
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Imaging cerebral arteries tortuosity and velocities by transcranial Doppler ultrasound is a reliable assessment of brain aneurysm in mouse models 94%
- Long term stability of patients undergoing endovascular parent artery occlusion of their intracranial artery 94%
- Aneurysmal versus “Benign” Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.