Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation Software: Utility and Potential Pitfalls
Tozuka, R.; Saito, M.; Matsuda, M.; Akita, T.; Nemoto, H.; Komiyama, T.; Kadoya, N.; Jingu, K.; Onishi, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate contouring of target volumes and organs at risk is critical for radiotherapy. While deep learning (DL) models offer efficient automation, their generalizability to real-world clinical cases containing anatomical variations and artifacts requires rigorous validation. PurposeTo evaluate the clinical accuracy and robustness of RatoGuide, a novel DL-based auto-segmentation software, using a dataset derived from routine clinical practice including atypical cases. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 36 patients treated for head and neck, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cancers. The cohort was intentionally selected to encompass diverse anatomies and artifacts (e.g., pacemakers, artificial femoral head replacement). Auto-contours generated by RatoGuide were compared with expert-approved manual contours. Performance was evaluated quantitatively using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95), and qualitatively via a 5-point visual assessment scale (higher is better) by four independent reviewers. A score of [≤]2 by multiple reviewers was defined as failure. ResultsOverall, the mean DSC, HD95, and visual assessment score were 0.79 {+/-} 0.19, 6.35 {+/-} 12.2 mm, and 3.65 {+/-} 0.88, respectively. The mean DSC exceeded 0.8 in 62% (23/37 organ structures) of the evaluated structure types, and a total of 93.5% (315/337) of all contours were considered clinically acceptable based on visual evaluation . However, lower performance was observed in small structures (e.g., optic chiasm) and low-contrast organs (e.g., esophagus). ConclusionsRatoGuide demonstrated favorable performance for major organs across various anatomical regions, consistent with benchmarks reported in the literature. However, performance variability in atypical cases underscores the necessity of rigorous visual verification by experts for clinical implementation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 96%
- Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk 94%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intermittent radiotherapy as alternative treatment for recurrent high grade glioma: A modelling study based on longitudinal tumor measurements 93%
- Identifying relationships between imaging phenotypes and lung cancer-related mutation status: EGFR and KRAS 93%
- Inconsistency of AI in Intracranial Aneurysm Detection with Varying Dose and Image Reconstruction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Inter-observer Delineation Performance of MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Therapy: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study 97%
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 95%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale crowdsourced radiotherapy segmentations across a variety of cancer anatomic sites: Interobserver expert/non-expert and multi-observer composite tumor and normal tissue delineation annotations from a prospective educational challenge 98%
- Segmentation of vestibular schwannoma from MRI — An open annotated dataset and baseline algorithm 97%
- Weekly Intra-Treatment Diffusion Weighted Imaging Dataset for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing MR-linac Treatment 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.