Back

A novel dual-chimeric surrogate virus to select, test and characterize mutants of protease and glycoprotein inhibitors.

Costacurta, F.; Dodaro, A.; Falch, A.; Rauch, S.; Riccabona, J.; Baecker, A.; Knabl, L.; Smith, L.; Schoeder, C. T.; Moro, S.; Gerold, G.; Heilmann, E.

2026-01-08 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.07.698196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antivirals are life-saving medications. However, pathogens develop resistances, mitigating their effect. Resistance studies (gain-of-function, GOF) are therefore paramount before and while antivirals are used clinically to characterize resistances and ideally study how to counteract them with other antivirals. The ability to switch from one antiviral, against which the virus is resistant, to another, depends on the availability of alternative drugs. Furthermore, targeting different parts of the virus synergistically with multiple drugs decreases the odds of simultaneous resistance. However, studying resistance, cross-resistance and remaining susceptibility requires working with the actual pathogen. Especially when introducing resistances into dangerous viruses, performing GOF studies would raise safety concerns and require firm biological containment. In this study we developed a novel dual-chimeric virus encoding both SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and main protease (Mpro) based on the model virus, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). We applied selection pressure with spike and Mpro inhibitors, generated mutants of these viruses and determined their resistance and cross-resistance profiles by performing dose-response experiments with live and pseudotyped viruses. Additionally, we conducted in silico calculations to determine the impact of spike substitutions to the observed resistance phenotype. With the new technology presented here, we demonstrate that it is possible to carry out GOF studies more safely and highlight their importance in the future challenges of virological research.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.