Back

Association between Gallstones or Cholecystectomy and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Li, F.; Murphy, G.; Mortell, G.; Cross, A.; Harewood, R.

2026-01-08 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.07.26343554 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGallstones and cholecystectomy may be associated with upper gastrointestinal cancer risk but findings from individual studies are inconsistent. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of available evidence. MethodsPubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were searched through September 2024 to identify case-control and cohort studies investigating gallstones or cholecystectomy and oesophageal or gastric cancer risk. Random effects models estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for oesophageal and gastric cancer. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 and {tau}2 statistics. ResultsThis meta-analysis included 15 studies. There was no association between gallstones [RR (95%CI) = 1.05 (0.97-1.14)] or cholecystectomy [RR (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.87-1.13)] and oesophageal cancer; however, both were positively associated with gastric cancer [RR (95% CI) = 1.25 (1.08-1.44); 1.10 (1.05-1.16), respectively]. In subgroup analyses, cholecystectomy was positively associated with non-cardia [RR (95%CI) = 1.17 (1.04-1.33)] but not cardia gastric cancer [RR (95% CI) = 0.89 (0.78-1.02)]; there were no other statistically significant associations by subtype/subsite, however data were limited for some subgroups. ConclusionsGallstones and cholecystectomy were positively associated with gastric cancer, cholecystectomy was specifically associated with non-cardia gastric cancer. Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer may be considered among individuals with gallstones or cholecystectomy history. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024563020

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.