Back

Type, location and zygosity of KCNJ16 mutations may determine the clinical severity of Hypokalemic Tubulopathy and Deafness (HkTD)

Gondra, L.; Mora, S.; Shaikh, I. G.; Garcia-Castano, A.; Schilling, F.; Ariceta, G.; Garcia-Suarez, L.; Tejera-Carreno, P.; Fernandez-Juarez, G.; Rodriguez, A. S.; Pujol-Gimenez, J.; Garcia-Alonso, M.; Gomez-Conde, S.; Aranaga Decori, A. C.; Koemhoff, M.; Renigunta, V.; Weber, S.; Madariaga, L.; Renigunta, A.

2026-01-15 nephrology
10.64898/2026.01.07.25343066 medRxiv
Show abstract

The pivotal role of Kir5.1 (KCNJ16) in maintaining electrolyte and acid-base homeostasis was demonstrated by animal studies and highlighted by the identification of disease-causing mutations in KCNJ16 resulting in a complex tubulopathy with variable severity. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive, the modus operandi of Kir5.1 is rooted in its heteromeric association with Kir4.1 (KCNJ10) and Kir4.2 (KCNJ15). The ubiquitous expression of KCNJ16 and the heterogenous clinical picture point towards the importance of protein-protein interactions and membrane trafficking of the heteromeric channels involving Kir5.1. Alongside a retrospective report on the R137C variant, we describe a divergent clinical phenotype in a patient compound heterozygous for I132R and R176*. Moreover, we characterize a novel variant (homozygous for K48* and Y57*) whose clinical presentation coincides with the phenotype of the Kcnj16-/- mouse model (lack of deafness). Functional studies, buttressed by biomolecular studies (imaging and Co-IPs) in mammalian cells emphasize that the type and location of the KCNJ16 mutations may determine their interaction, membrane localization, and consequently, channel function and the resulting clinical phenotype. Our study highlights the need for molecular understanding of the KCNJ16 variants to promote correct diagnosis and personalized therapies, especially those involving channel modulators.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.