Back

Antimicrobial activity of Syzygium aromaticum (clove) against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes is enhanced by optimized extraction methods

Justice-Alucho, C. H.; Braide, W.

2026-01-07 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.06.698043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clove (Syzygium aromaticum) is a food spice rich in phenolic profile with potent antimicrobial properties. However, the influence of solvent extraction efficiency and antimicrobial performance against selected foodborne pathogens needs to be further elucidation. In this study, four solvents (80% ethanol, 80% acetone, 75% methanol, and water) were analyzed for their impact on clove bud extraction yield and antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. Extraction yield varied significantly across solvents, with 80% acetone producing the highest recovery, while water yielded the lowest, with no significant difference from 75% methanol (p > 0.05). Preliminary agar diffusion screening revealed inhibition zones for all extracts and Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays demonstrated that acetone and ethanol extracts exerted the strongest inhibitory effect on S. aureus, whereas ethanol and methanol extracts were most effective against L. monocytogenes. Water extract consistently exhibited the weakest antimicrobial activity. A perfect correlation (r = 1.00) was observed between MIC and MBC for both organisms, and a strong negative correlation existed between extraction yield and antimicrobial thresholds for S. aureus (r = -0.98; p < 0.05), suggesting solvent-driven phytochemical concentration as a determinant of bioactivity. Collectively, these findings reaffirm the critical role of solvent polarity in maximizing phenolic extraction and antimicrobial potency of clove extracts as a promising natural antimicrobial agent for the control of foodborne pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.