Back

Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Intra-arterial Adenosine Following Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke (REACT) Trial: Rationale and Design

Hou, X.; He, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, G.; Nguyen, T. N.; Saver, J. L.; Wang, D.; Zi, W.; Zhou, Z.

2026-01-06 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.06.26343497 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAmong patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) who undergo successful reperfusion following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), only one-third are disability-free at 90 days, which may be related to persistent microvascular hypoperfusion after thrombectomy known as the "no-reflow phenomenon". Adenosine is administered to prevent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related no-reflow through microvasculature dilation and neutrophil-mediated inflammation modulation. However, its role in in the setting of AIS has not been clearly elucidated. ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjunctive intra-arterial adenosine following successful EVT in LVO patients. Methods and designIn this multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of adjunctive intra-arterial adenosine following successful EVT in AIS patients. Up to 160 eligible stroke patients with anterior intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours from symptom onset (time last known well) are planned to be consecutively randomized. The primary outcome was the shift in the distribution of mRS scores at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours and mortality at 90 days. DiscussionsThis pivotal trial will provide first-hand data on the efficacy and safety of adjunctive intra-arterial adenosine following successful EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO. Trial registry numberChiCTR2400092051 (www.chictr.org.cn).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.