Back

The Effect of Lifestyle-based Active Pursed-lip Diaphragmatic Breathing Training on the Prognosis of Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Zhou, Q.; Ma, D.; Lv, F.-J.; Luo, S.; Yang, S.

2026-01-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.05.26343492 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractRespiratory training benefits chronic heart failure (CHF) patients but is underused due to multiple barriers. Lifestyle-based active pursed-lip diaphragmatic breathing (PLDB) offers a feasible, device-independent alternative. This study aimed to evaluate its impact on CHF patients exercise tolerance, cardiac function, quality of life, and clinical outcomes. A prospective cohort study enrolled 58 hospitalized CHF patients (NYHA II-IV, Jan 2023-Feb 2024). All received standard therapy and PLDB instruction. Post-discharge, patients who self-administered PLDB were monitored via WeChat and grouped by adherence: the PLDB group ([&ge;]30 breaths/day, [&ge;]3 days/week, n=20) and the Control group (non-compliant, n=38). Outcomes included 6-minute walk test (6MWT), grip strength, serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and quality of life indicators (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire [MLHFQ], Self-rating Somatic Symptom Scale-China [SSS-CN], Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7], Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). Clinical endpoints were rehospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Over 6 months, the PLDB group showed significant improvements in 6MWT (333.75 {+/-} 148.57 m to 407.9{+/-}153.29m, p=0.012), LVEF (46.67{+/-}13.86% to 51.81{+/-}14.89%, p=0.002), and quality of life (MLHFQ: 42.25{+/-}16.00 to 18.75{+/-}13.47, p<0.001; GAD-7: 3.90{+/-}3.81 to 1.50{+/-}2.14, p=0.029; SSS-CN: 35.35{+/-}5.84 to 29.05{+/-}8.61, p=0.005), with lower MACE incidence and higher MACE-free survival. Six-month lifestyle-based active PLDB training improves exercise capacity, cardiac function, quality of life, and reduces MACE in CHF patients, serving as an effective, practical rehabilitation strategy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.