Back

Absorption Kinetics of Vitamins and Minerals from a Novel Nutritional Product in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial

Sapp, P. A.; Townsend, J. R.; Kirby, T. O.; Edwards, C. G.; LaMonica, M. B.; Ziegenfuss, T. N.; Vernge, M. J.; Akers, W. S.; Esposito, R.

2026-01-06 nutrition
10.64898/2026.01.05.25342664 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesNutrient interactions in multi-ingredient supplements may influence absorption and bioavailability, yet pharmacokinetic data in this context remains limited. This clinical trial assessed the post-prandial absorption kinetics of key micronutrients in AG1, a comprehensive supplement containing vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and phytonutrients. MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial 16 healthy adults (8 males and 8 females) consumed a single serving (13g) of AG1 or a taste- and appearance-matched placebo mixed in water, following a 10-hour overnight fast. Each condition was separated by a 1-week washout. Blood samples were collected pre-consumption and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes post-ingestion. Plasma concentrations of folate, calcium, zinc, vitamin C, biotin, nicotinamide, pyridoxine, riboflavin, thiamin, and hesperidin were measured. Area under the curve (AUC0-480 min) was used to assess nutrient absorption. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-tests. ResultsAG1 significantly increased AUC0-480 min values (p<0.05) for all measured nutrients except pyridoxine which revealed a strong trend (p = 0.075) and hesperidin (p = 0.224). Both AG1 and placebo were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. ConclusionsAcute consumption of AG1 resulted in measurable increases in circulating levels of most of the tested micronutrients, indicating effective absorption and bioavailability. These findings support the potential of AG1 to contribute meaningfully to nutritional status and overall health.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.