Back

Molecular, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Characterization of Plasmodium Infections that Evade Detection by Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Mizan Aman, Ethiopia

Carlton, J. M.; Nikulkova, M.; Kessler, A.; Wang, Z.; Patel, A.; Tolessa, T.; Teka, T.; Tesfaye, D.; Lukas, B.; Lemessa, D.; Zemede, M.; Legesse, F.; Srivastava, H.; Sullivan, S.; Yan, G.; Yewhalaw, D.

2026-01-06 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.01.04.25343089 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFailure of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to detect Plasmodium parasites in peripheral blood of individuals is a major barrier to successful case management and control of malaria in Ethiopia. Characterizing factors contributing to RDT failure is essential if malaria control and elimination strategies are to succeed. MethodsWe consented and enrolled 148 individuals with suspected malaria presenting to health clinics in Mizan Aman, Ethiopia. We administered a clinical questionnaire, diagnosed the presence of malaria parasites via RDT, and collected venous blood. Samples were assayed using molecular methods to detect parasite DNA, Plasmodium species, parasite load, and pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 gene deletions. RNA-seq libraries and LC-MS proteomics data were generated from all molecularly confirmed P. falciparum-infected individuals. ResultsWe identified 29/148 (27.9%) individuals as P. falciparum PCR positive with 26/29 (89.7%) false negative by a P.f/Pan RDT. RDT+ P. falciparum and P. vivax infections had higher parasite densities than RDT- infections. Of the 29 P. falciparum infections, 27 (93.1%) had deletions in both pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes, and 22 (75.9%) had negligible pfhrp2 transcripts. Ten P. falciparum samples had detectable PfLDH peptides, but no samples had PfHRP2 or PfHRP3 peptides detectable by LC-MS. ConclusionsOur molecular, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization of P. falciparum infections that fail detection by PfHRP2/pLDH-based RDTs in Mizan Aman, Ethiopia, revealed a heterogeneous array of factors that could be responsible for the observed RDT failure.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.