Back

Social Determinants of Health Associated with Multiple Myeloma Incidence and Survival among a Low-Income Cohort in the Southeastern U.S.

Junkins, A.; Wen, W.; Lipworth, L.; Han, X.; Munro, H.; Mumma, M. T.; Shrubsole, M.; Zheng, W.; Biltibo, E.; Sudenga, S.

2026-01-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.02.26343344 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesMultiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the U.S.; however, the etiology is poorly understood. We investigated social determinants of health (SDoH) associated with MM incidence and survival among low-income Black and White participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). MethodsThe SCCS enrolled participants aged 40-79 years from 12 Southeastern states. We examined associations between SDoH (residential racial segregation, neighborhood deprivation, population density, persistent poverty, and rurality) geocoded to zip code, with MM incidence and all-cause mortality using multivariable Cox regression analyses. Additional stratified analyses examined MM incidence by obesity status. ResultsAmong 74,294 participants, there were 162 MM cases, 133 self-identified as Black individuals and 29 self-identified as White individuals. Living in the highest vs. lowest deprivation areas was associated with 2-fold increased MM risk (HR:2.24; 95% CI:1.01-4.95). Among MM cases, those living in the least vs. most residentially segregated areas had 2-fold increased mortality (HR:2.21; 95% CI:1.03-4.74). Among participants who were not obese, those who lived in the most densely populated areas had a reduced risk of MM compared to those who lived in the least densely populated areas (HR:0.31; 95% CI: 0.14-0.67); and those who lived in urban vs. rural areas had a reduced risk (HR:0.52; 95% CI: 0.32-0.85). DiscussionSDoH factors including neighborhood deprivation and residential racial segregation could influence MM risk and survival among low-income populations. ConclusionSDOH factors should be considered when developing strategies to reduce overall MM burden, and disparities among people with lower socioeconomic backgrounds.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.