Back

Deletion of Dock7 Exons 3 and 4 Results in Reduced Trabecular Microarchitecture and a Decrease in Mineralization

Lizotte, T.; Lajoie, C.; Porter, S.; Lang, S.; Vesper, F. A.; Brooks, D. J.; Gartner, C.; Alexander, M. S.; Vary, C.; Bouxsein, M.; Becker, K. A.

2026-01-02 cell biology
10.64898/2025.12.31.696872 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dedicator of Cytokinesis 7 (DOCK7) has recently emerged as a regulator of skeletal homeostasis, but existing Dock7 mutant models harbor only global mutations and are incompatible with tissue-specific deletion studies. We previously generated a Dock7-floxed allele in which exons 3-4 are flanked by LoxP sites. To validate the utility of this allele for future conditional strategies, we globally deleted exons 3-4 to generate Dock7em2/em2mice and characterized their skeletal phenotype. Dock7em2/em2mice exhibited a diluted coat color and white belly spot, consistent with spontaneous Dock7 mutations. Bone microarchitecture was assessed in 21-week-old males and females. Global deletion of Dock7 exons 3-4 resulted in a 30-37% reduction in trabecular bone volume in the distal femur and L5 vertebrae. Cortical bone thickness was unchanged in both sexes; however, male Dock7em2/em2mice displayed reduced total femoral area, whereas females showed increased medullary area. These data suggest altered appositional bone growth with mutation of Dock7. To assess osteoblast function, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were differentiated in vitro. Dock7em2/em2 BMSCs exhibited reduced mineralization and decreased Bglap expression, indicating attenuated osteoblast differentiation. These findings demonstrate that Dock7 exons 3-4 are required for normal trabecular bone acquisition and osteoblast function. Loss of these exons disrupts DOCK7 activity, supporting the Dock7em2/em2 line as a valid loss-of-function model. The Dock7em2/em2 mouse provides a foundation for future tissue-specific deletion studies to define the cellular roles of DOCK7 in regulating bone formation and trabecular architecture.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
7
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
8
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
12
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
13
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
14
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
16
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
17
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
18
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
20
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%