Back

Non-specific effects of vaccines on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) 2012-2025

Schou, J.; Hviid, A. P.; Petersen, E.; Simonsen, L.

2026-01-02 epidemiology
10.64898/2025.12.31.25343212 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly observational studies reported substantial reductions in all-cause mortality, suggesting that childhood vaccines might influence health in ways beyond their targeted disease. Such Non-Specific Effects (NSEs) of vaccines could potentially have important implications for the Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI). In 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) commissioned a review of the NSE evidence, which called for more Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). We aimed to review all RCTs published after this WHO-commissioned review. MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched systematically for RCTs published during 2012-2025. Inclusion criteria: children under 5 years and all-cause mortality as the primary outcome for any vaccine intervention. Risk estimates were pooled using a random effects model, reflecting the underlying hypothesis: that live-attenuated vaccines greatly reduce, and inactivated vaccines increase all-cause mortality. ResultsWe identified seven RCTs that fit the inclusion criteria, all of them of live-attenuated vaccines (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, measles, and oral polio vaccine). In total, 52,596 participants were included across these studies. Five were conducted in Guinea-Bissau, one in Guinea-Bissau and Burkina Faso, and one in India. The RCTs were not blinded, and no placebo was used, consistent with a moderate risk of bias. Our meta-analysis found no significant evidence of NSEs (vaccine effectiveness 5%; -16% to 22%). One study of low birthweight newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units in India found a small but statistically significant NSE (17%; 2% to 31%); interestingly the effect primarily played out in the first 3 days of the study, raising concern of bias. DiscussionThe meta-analysis of seven RCTs of live-attenuated vaccines found no evidence of significant NSE on all-cause mortality. This was also true when adding RCTs from before 2012 studying NSEs. In conjunction with the WHO-SAGE review, the current body of evidence on NSEs on all-cause mortality does not warrant a paradigm shift, nor does it provide a rationale for changing vaccine programs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.