Back

High-Throughput, Multiplex Immunofluorescence for the Computer-automated Immunophenotyping of Mycosis Fungoides

McMullan, P.; Benoit, M. R.; Gasek, N.; Riddick, S.; Masison, J.; Ferenczi, K.; Rowe, D.; Weston, G.

2026-01-01 pathology
10.64898/2025.12.30.697118 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The diagnosis of Mycosis Fungoides (MF) is difficult and often delayed, exacerbated by the constraint of conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) to analyze only one antigen per tissue section, often necessitating repeat biopsies and extensive workups. We sought to validate a high-throughput Multiplex Immunofluorescence (MIF) method, coupled with computer-automated image analysis, to generate comprehensive immunophenotyping data from a single formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsy. We applied an 11-biomarker MIF panel across 18 archived skin specimens (9 MF/TCR clonality positive and 9 control/TCR clonality negative). Initial validation confirmed that MIF antigen expression and spatial localization were concordant with sequential IHC-stained sections. Whole slide image stacks were analyzed using both computer-assisted and fully computer-automated pipelines. Both methods successfully delineated immunophenotypic differences. MF specimens showed a significant expansion of hematopoietic cells and proliferative T-lymphocytes compared to controls. Crucially, MF tissues also exhibited a significant increase in the percentage of atypical T-lymphocytes. Our results validate the potential of MIF to obtain comprehensive, high-dimensional diagnostic information from a single tissue section. Integration with computer-automated analysis offers a scalable, high-throughput platform that can significantly aid in the timely and accurate diagnosis of cutaneous lymphomas.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
6
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
19
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%