Back

Prospective Observational Study On The Association Between Perioperative Cortisol Level And Hemodynamic Variables In Patients Undergoing Pituitary Surgeries

Sarguru, P. R.; Prathapadas, U.; Vimala, S.; Nair, P.; Sethuraman, M.; Hrishi, A. P.; Praveen C S, R.; Vishnu, B.

2025-12-31 anesthesia
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343221 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough transnasal transsphenoidal (TNTS) resection is the standard treatment for pituitary adenomas, the procedure carries a risk of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis disruption. This potential for hypocortisolism often prompts the empiric use of perioperative steroids to mitigate hemodynamic instability. However, there is a paucity of data strictly correlating serum cortisol concentrations with intraoperative blood pressure fluctuations. This study sought to evaluate the relationship between perioperative cortisol levels, hemodynamic stability, and the necessity for vasopressors, while also examining the efficacy of prophylactic steroid administration. MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study involving 90 adult patients (aged 18-60) undergoing elective TNTS at a tertiary care center. Serial serum cortisol measurements were taken at baseline, on the morning of surgery, post-induction, post-sphenid drilling, and during episodes of refractory hypotension. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring included heart rate and arterial pressures (systolic, diastolic, and mean). Hydrocortisone prophylaxis was administered to high-risk patients or those with baseline cortisol <80 ng/ml. Statistical associations were determined using Spearman correlation and multivariate logistic regression models. ResultsOur analysis revealed no statistically significant association between perioperative cortisol levels and the incidence of hypotension or vasopressor requirements across any time point. Furthermore, the administration of prophylactic hydrocortisone failed to demonstrate a reduction in the occurrence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.